By LILLIAN ROBERTS
Executive Director
District Council 37, AFSCME
When it comes to housing, most of our members
are in a bind. Theyre trapped between their modest salaries and the soaring
cost of a place to live.
For working-class people, New York Citys
housing boom is a housing crisis. Too many of the workers who keep this city running
DC 37 members cant afford to live in the city.
Beautiful
high-rise towers full of million-dollar one-bedroom apartments have driven out
affordable housing. Working people have been friendless as the political establishment
gradually erased rent controls, subsidized luxury housing, and allowed buy-outs
and privatization of subsidized middle-income housing, such as Stuyvesant Town
and Mitchell-Lama buildings.
The residency requirement has locked over
45,000 of our lowest-paid members in an economic prison and the City Council
holds the key. We are working hard to convince the council to loosen the residency
requirement to help our members find affordable housing. Passing Intro. 452 would
expand the area where they must live beyond the five boroughs by adding six nearby
counties Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Orange and Putnam.
The current residency restriction imposes intolerable financial burdens on
middle-class workers. With average salaries in the low $30,000s, DC 37 members
are bearing an unfair share of the costs of the housing crisis. We are telling
the City Council it is time for a change now.
Intro. 452 would
simply implement the residency provision of our 2005-2008 contract, an agreement
that we negotiated in good faith with the city. Never before has the City Council
rejected the contents of a legitimate labor contract. Repudiating Intro. 452 would
be a dangerous precedent, threatening labors right to settle issues peacefully
at the bargaining table. Passing Intro. 452 would preserve the integrity of the
collective bargaining process.
Although 85 percent of our members live
in the city and in their districts the council members who are trying
to block Intro. 452 have done little to increase the supply of affordable housing
for working families.
DC 37 has done more to help members cope with the
housing crisis than any other union. Working with the city and many banks, our
Municipal Employees Housing Program provides down-payment grants, credit counseling,
lower-priced mortgages and more to help members obtain affordable housing
rentals, co-ops, condos and houses. But right now, 200 members in the program
have pre-approved mortgages. Theyre ready to buy but they cant
find housing they can afford anywhere in the five boroughs!
Our
right to choose
Some fear that Intro. 452 would
lead to a mass exodus of city employees, but the evidence tells us otherwise.
Seven of our locals are exempt from the residency rule, but the vast majority
of their members still live within the five boroughs. But just like these members,
all our members deserve the right to choose where to live based on their individual
family needs.
Meanwhile, better-paid city employees such as police, fire
and teachers are not tied down by the same residency rule as employees represented
by DC 37. In 2005, Sanitation workers won the right to extend their search for
affordable housing into the six surrounding counties. Giving our members the same
geographic choice is simply a matter of economic justice.
We represent
the most diversified group of city workers in terms of job functions, gender,
ethnicity and race. Failure to pass Intro. 452 would consign these employees to
an economic underclass and bring into question the City Councils commitment
to equal justice for all. For the 121,000 members of District Council 37, fixing
the residency regulation is far more than an economic issue. It is a matter of
our human right to equality under the law.
To the City Council I say:
Our average pay may be less than some groups, but when it comes to where we live,
we deserve equal rights.
To our members I say: Stay ready for whatever
action it takes political or otherwise to enforce our contract and
win our rights.