|
Public
Employee Press Residency: Keeping
the pressure on
DC
37 members do much better |
| | |
This
city has become for the extremely rich and the very poor. New York is no longer
affordable to working- class and middle-class people. Karen
Hunter DC 37 member | We
need residency now. Its about equity and options for our members.
Michael DeMarco President, Local 1455 | We
are having to choose between rent and food. I see too many of us having to face
these decisions. Alma Roper Local 1549 |
By
DIANE S. WILLIAMS
District Council 37 local leaders and members gathered
on the steps of City Hall Jan. 30 to lobby the City Council to pass Intro. 452,
the bill that would lift residency requirements on DC 37 members.
The day
of action was followed by a private meeting on Jan. 31 betweeen Executive Director
Lillian Roberts and City Council Speaker Christine Quinn.
There has
been some discussion that has resulted in a positive meeting, said Roberts.
We are optimistic that we can move forward, and we reasonably expect to
achieve our goal of having the City Council enact the residency legislation.
For
months Roberts has led the unions campaign to keep the pressure on lawmakers
to lift the requirement that DC 37 members live in the five boroughs as a condition
of employment.
Intro. 452 would allow some 45,000 DC 37 members now covered
by the restriction to live in the surrounding counties of Westchester, Rockland,
Orange, Putnan, Suffolk, and Nassau. Passing the bill would give DC 37 members
parity with other city employees who do not have this restriction.
Equity
and options We need residency now. Its about equity
and options for our members, said Michael DeMarco, president of Traffic
Employees Local 1455. This is a matter of fairness. Its unfair that
DC 37 members who work at city agencies are not allowed to live in the six surrounding
counties while other city employees like Teachers, Police, Sanitation workers
and Firefighters at the same agencies can.
In recent months the union launched a letter-writing campaign,
held press conferences at City Hall, lobbied Council members, and placed thousands
of phone calls from its computerized phone banks to get the bill passed. The union
gained support from a majority of Council members and is pressing Quinn to call
for a vote on the legislation.
My co-worker is weighing giving up
her two-bedroom apartment to rent a one-bedroom that she and her child can afford,
said Alma Roper, a member of Clerical-Administrative Employees Local 1549 who
joined with DC 37 activists at City Hall during her lunch hour Jan. 31.
The
lack of affordable housing in the Big Apple takes a huge bite out of the paychecks
of DC 37 members, who earn an average of about $31,000 a year. With two-bedroom
apartments in Manhattan renting at about $4,500 a month and similar-sized co-ops
in the borough and parts of Brooklyn and Queens selling for around $1 million,
the employees who keep New York City running say they can no longer afford to
live where they work.
We are having to choose between
rent and food. I see too many of us having to face these decisions, Roper
added.
I should have the option to live where its comfortable
for my pocket and not sacrifice my job, said DC 37 member Karen Hunter.
This city has become for the extremely rich and the very poor. New York
is no longer affordable to working-class and middle-class people. We need to stand
up. Passing Intro. 452 would be worthwhile to us all.
| |