Problems
arise when Commissioner Stern casts aside civil service system. Union sues to
enforce members rights.
By DIANE S. WILLIAMS
The U.S.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has found reasonable cause
to believe the New York City Parks Dept. illegally discriminates against African
American and Latino employees.
The federal findings on racial bias in
assignments and promotions bolstered minority workers allegations that the
grass is greener across the color line.
The EEOC report, which was released
in February, responded to complaints filed in 1999 by 20 current and former Parks
workers who accused the agency of creating a racially prejudiced employment system.
They charged that Parks circumvented civil service procedures by failing to administer
exams or post job openings and passed over veteran African American and Latino
employees in favor of less-experienced white recruits.
Good
ol boys on top
Employment statistics presented to the
EEOC indicated that while the work force is 50 percent minority, senior management
staff remains predominantly white. Local 983 President Mark Rosenthal said this
makes the department resemble an ongoing plantation. The report is
the third study in five years that has criticized the agencys handling of
minority issues.
At the heart of the controversy, say union members,
are agency programs that make a sham of the civil service merit system and block
the career paths of longtime employees who are minorities. A former chief of recreation
for Brooklyn parks, Walter Beach III, said that instead of using civil service
titles, the Parks Dept. creates its own titles and job descriptions.
Junior Manager, for example, said Mr. Rosenthal, is a made-up
crony title awarded to the commissioners pets.
Managerial
positions often go to recruits from Commissioner Henry Sterns controversial
Class of program that brings in mostly white college graduates from
elite schools. Workers say minority employees who have worked in the system for
decades in lower-paid titles often train these Ivy Leaguers, who are then promoted
to management positions over the veterans.
People who are qualified
are not being recognized for what they can do, said Michael Hood, president
of Local 1505 and chair of the DC 37 Parks Policy Committee. If the civil
service ladder were used properly, it would certainly lessen the problem.
DC 37s Legal Department has brought lawsuits and is planning additional
suits to compel the city and the Parks Dept. to give exams where members serve
provisionally beyond the time limit permitted by civil service law. In a recent
case, the court agreed with the union that employees who were appointed as year-round
seasonals were in effect provisional appointees serving beyond the nine-month
term allowed under civil service law. Both the Civil Service Law and the state
constitution require that appointments to civil service jobs be made on the basis
of merit, which should be determined by competitive examinations. DC 37 General
Counsel Joel Giller said, The union will sue whenever it finds an agency
violating these important principles.
The recent federal report
adds teeth to the workers case as they prepare to file a class action civil
rights lawsuit against the city. The U.S. Dept. of Justice may join the suit,
said one of their attorneys, Lewis Steel, and the EEOC reasonable cause finding
will certainly help this case.
Mr. Steel said the bias in
Parks was blatant on many levels. Many of our plaintiffs are so well-qualified,
it should have been impossible for them not to move up.