The public agencies making critical decisions regarding
the health of workers exposed to toxic substances after 9/11 are turning
their backs on the very people they are supposed to protect,
DC 37s safety chief testified recently.
Lee Clarke, director of the DC 37 Safety and Health Dept., testified
before the New York State Democratic congressional delegation on April
28, Workers Memorial Day. She pressed for a team approach between
government agencies and the unions, proper training, emergency preparedness
programs, and medical monitoring.
The Congress members got $90 million added to the 2003 appropriations
bill for short- and long-term monitoring of workers who are experiencing
negative health effects from being at Ground Zero. The Mt. Sinai Center
for Occupational and Environmental Medicine has provided medical screening
for over 6,000 exposed workers and volunteers.
Thus far, only 300 members of DC 37 have been screened by Mt. Sinai,
but the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and
the federal Centers for Disease Control are now considering options
that would divert the funds to other programs. Without the money,
the program is in jeopardy.
On May 2, NIOSH held a public meeting in New York City on priorities
and strategies for monitoring. Sen. Hillary Clinton and U.S. Rep.
Carolyn Maloney testified on the need to continue funding for the
program at Mt. Sinai.
At the April hearing, Ms. Clarke said the federal Occupational Safety
and Health Administration touts the partnership with private
sector contractors at Ground Zero as a success, simply because not
one worker lost his/her life during the recovery period. But you have
also heard the medical experts report that hundreds if not thousands
of these rescue workers have suffered and will suffer from numerous
short- and long-term illnesses associated with working at Ground Zero.
How does OSHA measure success? Are they saying that one fatality
is too much but hundreds of workers with long-term respiratory illnesses
is acceptable?