By GREGORY N. HEIRES
MTA New York City Transit
has pledged to spend $750 million for union members to manage construction of
the planned 2nd Avenue subway.
The agency has also given Local 375
a less ironclad commitment that it will assign city architects and engineers major
responsibilities in the final design phase. Local 375 President Claude Fort estimates
this job at $250 million, bringing the total value of the work the local has won
to $1 billion.
The union local won the pledge after it waged a campaign
of several months to protest the contracting out of preliminary design work.
"Because we made our voice heard in a big way, Transit has apparently backed
off turning this important project into a gold mine for contractors," said
Mr. Fort. "We will make sure Transit sticks to its word on keeping a significant
portion of the work in-house."
In the fall, Local 375 leaders were
outraged over the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's approval of a $200 million
contract for preliminary design work with the firm DMJM+Harris ARUP (DHA).
Because firms chosen for preliminary design typically also win the contract
for the final plans, Local 375 was worried that the decision of MTA, New York
City Transit's parent agency, meant that members wouldn't participate in the job.
Local 375 launched a campaign to show that keeping the design work in-house
would save taxpayers' money at a critical time, with the state and city facing
major budget problems. A Local 375 study shows that doing the work in-house would
have saved $250 million out of the total cost of $600 million for the preliminary
and final designs.
In the campaign, Local 375 worked with Transit Workers
Union Local 100 to reach out to politicians. The Public Employee Press ran a major
article about the possible waste of taxpayers' money, and the local media covered
the story as well.
In April, Local 375 held two major demonstrations
in front of New York City Transit's 2 Broadway office."The publicity and
demonstrating forced Transit to listen," said Local 375 Treasurer Robert
Mariano, who heads the local's chapter at the agency.
On April 30, Mr.
Fort and Mr. Mariano headed a Local 375 delegation at a meeting with Mysore L.
Nagaraja, senior vice president and chief engineer at MTA New York City Transit.
After expressing his displeasure that the local's campaign put the agency in a
bad light, Mr. Nagaraja said Transit was willing to assign a significant portion
of the 2nd Avenue subway project to city professional workers.
Specifically,
he said that Transit plans to use in-house engineering staff for program management
during the design and construction phase. The estimated cost of that work is $750
million.
At the meeting, Mr. Nagaraja said that the agency would also
use the in-house staff during the final design phase instead of contracting out
all of that work. These responsibilities would include design work on signals,
electricity and stations.
In a May 1 letter to Mr. Fort, Mr. Nagaraja
reaffirmed the agency's plan to keep the $750 million design and construction
management in-house.
But regarding the final phase, Local 375 is concerned
that Nagaraja's letter said only, "final design components will be considered
for in-house design."
In a follow-up letter to Mr. Nagaraja, Mr.
Fort underscored his concern about the apparent backpedaling. "With respect
to final design it is our understanding that agreement was reached that the in-house
engineering staff will perform major parts of the final design, such as signals,
station design, electrical, etc.," Mr. Fort wrote in a letter to Mr. Nagaraja
on May 20. "These design services should not be in a 'will be considered'
category as mentioned in your letter."
The 2nd Avenue subway construction,
which would cost about $15 billion, isn't approved yet. The project would extend
the subway line from the 125th Street area to Lower Manhattan.