|
Public
Employee Press Legal News Union
legal action fights layoffs
In addition to fighting contracting out and job
cuts with a media and mass leafleting campaign to educate the public and pressing
the City Council to restore funds to the budget, DC 37 battled layoffs by using
personnel regulations, contract language and state and federal labor law as weapons.
Among
other actions, the union has formally disputed an administrative move by the Health
and Hospitals Corp. that would make it easier to target layoffs at certain groups
of workers.
Layoff units expand
Years ago,
the entire hospital system was one layoff unit, within which HHC had
to follow strict procedures including recognition of seniority rights
if it carried out layoffs.
Over the years, HHC has sought more control
by establishing a series of smaller layoff units throughout the giant health-care
network, which includes 11 acute-care hospitals, four skilled-nursing facilities,
six large diagnostic and treatment centers and more than 80 community-based clinics.
In
April, HHC said it planned to lay off workers because of budget cuts, and informed
the union that it would further narrow the definition of layoff units to include
sections of stand-alone facilities. The smaller units would give HHC great flexibility
in identifying the workers to be axed and in many instances ignore seniority rights,
according to the union.
DC 37 Research and Negotiations Director Dennis
Sullivan registered the unions objection to the smaller units on May 13
in a letter to HHC Senior Vice President Frank J. Cirillo aimed at triggering
a review of the new procedures covering members of locals 299, 371, 420, 768,
983 and 1549. When HHC refused to address the unions objection, the DC 37
Legal Dept. filed an appeal with HHCs Personnel Review Board.
Protecting
seniority rights
Some of the senior employees slated to
be laid off in these narrowly defined layoff units have been denied the right
to displace or bump less senior employees, Sullivan said. This violates
the principles of civil service and undermines the notion of preserving seniority
and longevity.
Seniority rights are also a paramount concern as the
union challenges the April layoffs of 48 zoo and aquarium employees in Local 1501.
Shortly
after the firings, Assistant General Counsel Meaghean Murphy filed a federal unfair
labor practice charge against the Wildlife Conservation Society for failing to
negotiate with the union over layoffs.
The union has also filed 35 grievances
charging that WCS management violated the contracts protection of seniority
rights and improperly cut the pay of workers who were bumped to new positions.
Gov.
David Patersons unusual and inappropriate decision to go over the heads
of state unions by urging workers to pressure their elected leaders to give back
negotiated 3 percent pay raises led state employees including members of
DC 37s Rent Regulation Employees Local 1359 to demonstrate April
30 at the governors Manhattan office.
Patersons open
letter to state employees said workforce concessions were preferable
to significant layoffs and asked workers to voice this opinion to
your union representatives.
Coercing workers
In
response, DC 37 filed a charge against the governor with the state Public Employment
Relations Board. The union said Paterson interfered with the Local 1359 members
rights under the Taylor Law and with DC 37s role as the employees
bargaining agent. The governors letter was sent for the specific purpose
of coercing employees, Assistant General Counsel Dena Klein wrote on behalf
of DC 37 General Counsel Mary J. OConnell.
Kleins charge
asked PERB to order the reinstatement of any laid-off workers, but the dispute
ended June 4, when Paterson and state unions reached an agreement to avoid the
givebacks and 8,900 planned layoffs, provide a $20,000 buyout offer for certain
employees, and establish a new pension tier for new workers with a higher retirement
age and longer contribution period.
Additional news about the unions
battle to prevent layoffs is on page 3.
GNH
| |