|
Public
Employee Press State
handcuffs NYPD effort to skirt safety law
In a union victory that
protects hundreds of employees at the Manhattan South Task Force, the state Dept.
of Labor denied a request from the city Police Dept. to exempt the West 42nd Street
site from the requirement to have two evacuation routes.
“In the rare
case of a fire blocking the only exit, people could die,” said Lisa Baum,
principal program coordinator in the DC 37 Safety and Health Dept.
After
DOL’s Public Employee Safety and Health Bureau found the New York Police
Dept. in violation, the city agency sought a variance.
Experts, including
PESH engineers, Baum and DC 37 attorney Dena Klein, testified before an impartial
DOL hearing officer, who ruled June 3 that the NYPD had failed to show that it
could make the site “as safe as if it complied with the safety and health
standard.”
PESH requires buildings to have two means of egress far
enough from each other so that if one is blocked, employees can escape from the
other in an emergency. Manhattan South’s four-story 1954 building, flanked
by a hotel and Con Edison plant and walled in from the rear, has just one exit.
To
avoid the PESH regulation, Klein argued, the building would need “protections
in place to provide the same degree of safety required by law.” The agency
said it would have fire drills and install smoke detectors, which are required
anyway, and put in a wheel chair lift, “which was nice,” Baum said,
“but does not meet the requirements for an acceptable emergency egress.”
Baum,
Clerical Division Rep Nate Hurt and Blue Collar Division Rep Yolanda Johnson have
visited the site to work with the Police Dept. on a safety solution for the Local
1549 and 1597 members who work there 24/7. The Dept. of Citywide Administrative
Services, which manages the building, has not said whether or when it will address
the DOL ruling, and the union is watching to see if the city will relocate Manhattan
South to a safer facility.
Meanwhile, the NYPD is racking up daily fines
for the violation.
“The Department of Labor sided with the union and
placed the safety of workers first,” Klein said. “It may be difficult
and expensive for an employer to comply with a particular state safety law, but
that does not outweigh employees’ health and safety interests.”
| |