|
Public Employee Press
Locals submitting salary
review proposals Union
locals are preparing proposals to improve pay and other compensation for specific
job titles and occupational groups within the framework of the unions new
economic agreement with the city. The pact provides for a Salary Review
Panel to consider proposals to upgrade workers deemed to deserve better compensation.
Proposals are supposed to be submitted to the panel within 160 days after
the ratification of the new collective bargaining agreement, which members approved
by 97 percent in a mail-ballot vote announced Aug. 25. The DC 37 Research
and Negotiations Dept. is compiling applications from locals to prepare a report
for the panel. Among the locals exploring proposals are 372, 375, 983, 1407, 1549
and library locals 1321, 1482 and 1930. The department plans to hold
a meeting soon with local union presidents to discuss the salary review process.
The union also expects to draw upon research from its White Paper project
headed by Associate Director Oliver Gray and Assistant to the Associate Director
Henry Garrido, DC 37 Executive Director Lillian Roberts said. Funding
through savings The project studies ways the city could save money
by eliminating wasteful contracting out of city jobs. In recent years, the White
Paper findings have led the city to quietly halt some contracting and to replace
consultants with union computer workers. The Salary Review Panel will
include representatives of the union and the city and a third member to be agreed
upon by both sides. Because the contract does not provide for funding,
the union will be responsible for identifying possible savings to justify any
upgrades it agrees on. The economic agreement calls for the panel to
consider proposals for titles and occupational groups that meet any of four criteria:
- workers in revenue-producing titles,
- employees
in titles or occupational groups that were previously contracted out but are now
filled by union members,
- workers whose duties have evolved
to require significant improvement in skills and responsibilities, and
- workers
paid significantly below their counterparts in the private sector or with state,
county or municipal jobs.
The Salary Review Panel
is a creative and novel provision of the contract, which we are approaching very
seriously, Roberts said. Whether its by pointing to
inefficient management practices, below-market pay scales, under-compensation
of highly skilled workers and others who have assumed more complex duties and
responsibilities, we hope to be able to successfully push for upgrades for deserving
workers, Roberts said. Over the years, the union has tried to use
the bargaining process to address under-compensation particularly though not exclusively
of professional workers. Contracts have included equity panels to identify titles
for raises and have set up additional compensation funds to allow bargaining units
to add straight salary hikes, differentials, salary increments and even annuities. | |